Document: draft-loreto-simple-im-srv-label-01.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@nsn.com> 
Review Date: 2008-07-09 
Review Due: 2008-07-11
Review Type: Expert (re-review)

Summary:  Almost ready.

Comments:

I still have some minor comments. Please address them and (if you agree), provide a version of the draft.

- The title of the draft must be carefully selected. Unfortunately it is going to be long. I noticed that the RFC Editor now allows the usage of "DNS SRV RR" without expansion, but I think that "SIP" should be still expanded. The same applies to "SIMPLE".

- Also on the title. I dislike to refer to SIMPLE as it were a new protocol, even when the industry refers to it as such. I think the title should contain the word "Presence" (which I mentioned in my earlier
comments) and "SIP", but not "SIMPLE". My suggestion for the title:

      Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Registration of
   Instant Messaging and Presence DNS SRV RRs for the Session
            Initiation Protocol (SIP)

- Abstract. There are no reference to "Presence", although there are to "Instant Messaging". It should be fixed.

- General to the draft. As for the title, I dislike the usage of "SIP/SIMPLE". I think we should use "SIP usage of Presence and Instant Messaging" instead. This is a simple find&replace operation.

- Ambiguity in Section 4. The text reads:

    This specification registers a new SRV Protocol Label in both the
    Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label registry and the Presence SRV
    Protocol Label registry.

I suggest:

    This specification registers a new SRV Protocol Label in each of the
    Instant Messaging SRV Protocol Label registry and the Presence SRV
    Protocol Label registry, respectively.