Document: draft-bryant-mpls-tp-jwt-report-00 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 03 Oct 2008 IESG Telechat date: 09 Oct 2008 Summary: (I was assigned this both as a LC review and a telechat review--with the telechat oddly happening before the end of the LC. Hopefully this review can serve both purposes.) This draft may be ready to publish as an informational RFC, but there is an issue I'm not sure what to think of. See details below. Major issues: This draft does something I've never seen before, which is to explicitly call for two versions of the RFC: a PDF version that contains imbedded slides, and a text version which merely describes the slides. The one under review is the text version. I understand the desire to do this, as this draft describes proceedings of an IETF/ITU-T joint effort, and each group has different standards of documentation. But I am not sure what to think of an RFC that is published in two different formats, with the content being substantially different between them. I don't propose that this is a bad or or thing--merely something for the ADs to think about. It might work to have _both_ versions merely reference the slides as an external document, but that would have archival issues--which is I think the reason for this draft in the first place. Nits/editorial comments: Abstract, sentence 2: The first part of the sentence (prior to the colon) does not parse. Is the word "of" a typo?