Draft:  draft-ietf-sipping-presence-scaling-requirements-02
Reviewer: Hisham Khartabil [hisham.khartabil@gmail.com]
Review Date: Nov-13-2008
Review Deadline: 
Status: WGLC (RAI/SIMPLE review)

Summary: Almost ready


Comments:
---------


All ok except for REQ-001. I still this it should be split into 2. I also don't understand what the second sentence is trying to say
 
"The ability of existing SIP/
      SIMPLE clients and/or servers from peering with a domain or a
      client implementing the solution SHOULD be retained with no
      changes required of existing servers to interoperate."
 
Maybe rephrase to
 
"Existing SIP/SIMPLE clients SHOULD be able to communicate with new clients and servers implementing any new presence scaling features"