Draft: draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-10.txt Reviewer: Joël Repiquet [joel.repiquet@tech-invite.com] Review Date: Saturday 6/17/2006 1:38 PM CST Review Deadline: 7/01/2006 Status: WGLC Section: 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 related to Transfer Summary: 2.4. Transfer - Unattended ------------------------------ 1) The "Supported: replaces" message-header line in F1, F3, F4, F11 and F13 is superfluous and I suggest to remove it 2) The session identifier (2890844527) is the same for Bob's SDP offer in F1, and for (unrelated) Carol's SDP answer in F13. idem for the audio transport port (3456) 3) IP addresses appear to be: - 192.0.2.105 for Alice - 192.0.2.113 for Bob As a result, in F6: (response to Alice) ;received=192.0.2.113 is to be replaced by: ;received=192.0.2.105 4) In F5, the initial value of the sequence number for this first request on the UAS side within this dialog is very unlikely to be 2. Although it is not incorrect in the strict sense, I suggest the value 101 for avoiding any confusion. Therefore, the line: CSeq: 2 REFER is to be replaced by: CSeq: 101 REFER and as a result: in F6, the line: CSeq: 2 REFER is to be replaced by: CSeq: 101 REFER in F9, the line: CSeq: 3 BYE is to be replaced by: CSeq: 102 BYE in F10, the line: CSeq: 3 BYE is to be replaced by: CSeq: 102 BYE 2.5. Transfer - Attended ------------------------- 1) In the comments before the message details, the line: prepared, if the triggered INVITE had fails, to retry the REFER with is to be replaced by: prepared, if the triggered INVITE had failed, to retry the REFER with 2) IP addresses appear to be: - 192.0.2.103 for Alice - 192.0.2.113 for Bob - 192.0.2.123 for Carol As a result: in F20: (response to Alice) ;received=192.0.2.123 is to be replaced by: ;received=192.0.2.103 in F23: (response to Carol) ;received=192.0.2.103 is to be replaced by: ;received=192.0.2.123 in F24: (F20 response to Alice in the message/sipfrag body) ;received=192.0.2.123 is to be replaced by: ;received=192.0.2.103 3) F19 has 2 extra whitespace lines 2.6. Transfer - Instant Messaging ---------------------------------- 1) In the text/html body of F5, the to-tag should be: 3145678 as a result, the line: 12345600@atlanta.example.com%3Bto-tag%3D314159 is to be replaced by: 12345600@atlanta.example.com%3Bto-tag%3D3145678 2) In F7, F8 and F9: Call-ID: 563456212@b2.biloxi.example.com is to be replaced by: Call-ID: 563456212@b2.chicago.example.com