Gen-ART Assignments for June 19, 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-06-19).


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAIReferring to Multiple Resources in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 12
draft-ietf-sip-multiple-refer-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Francis Dupont (reviewed -02 for LC)
    
RAIA general mechanism for RTP Header Extensions (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 12
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-hdrext-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Tom Taylor <taylor@nortel.com> is PROTO Shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Francis Dupont (already reviewed)
    
INTPseudowire (PW) Management Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 12
draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer:Gonzalo Camarillo (reviewed -12 for LC)
    
RAISubscriptions to Request-Contained Resource Lists in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 12
draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-subscribe-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Pasi Eronen (already reviewed)
    
RAIConference Establishment Using Request-Contained Lists in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 12
draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-conferencing-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (already reviewed)
    
RAIMultiple-Recipient MESSAGE Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 12
draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-message-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -02 for LC)
    
RAIIANA Registration of Enumservices for Voice and Video Messaging (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 12
draft-ietf-enum-vmsg-02.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC)
    
INTControl Protocol Extensions for Setup of TDM Pseudowires in MPLS Networks (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 12
draft-ietf-pwe3-tdm-control-protocol-extensi-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer:Eric Gray (assigned LC ending 6/17)
    
SECUsing SCVP to Convey Long-term Evidence Records (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 12
draft-ietf-ltans-ers-scvp-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer:Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed)
    
RTGBasic Specification for IP Fast-Reroute: Loop-free Alternates (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 12
draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-12.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: David Ward
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (already reviewed)
    
APPSieve Email Filtering: Editheader Extension (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 12
draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-11.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed)
    
SECAES-GCM Cipher Suites for TLS (Proposed Standard) - 12 of 12
draft-ietf-tls-rsa-aes-gcm-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Pasi Eronen
  Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani (LC due 6/11)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
RAIA Document Format for Requesting Consent (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Returning in search of more positions.
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Christian Vogt (reviewed -06)
    
RAITwo-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 2 of 2
RTP Payload Format for JPEG 2000 Video Streams (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-19.txt
Note: The document shepherd is Colin Perkins.
  Reviewer: Brian Carpenter (already reviewed)
     
Payload Format for JPEG 2000 Video: Extensions for Scalability and Main Header Recovery (Proposed Standard)
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-jpeg2000-beam-10.txt
Note: The document shepherd is Colin Perkins.
  Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer: David Black (reviewed -09)
   

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSIANA Considerations and IETF Protocol Usage for IEEE 802.1 Parameters (BCP) - 1 of 3
draft-eastlake-ethernet-iana-considerations-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Eric Gray (reviewed -05 for LC)
    
SECSharing Transaction Fraud Data (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3
draft-mraihi-inch-thraud-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (reviewed -05 for LC)
    
GENSIV Authenticated Encryption using AES (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3
draft-dharkins-siv-aes-04.txt
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVFour-Document ballot: [Open Web Ballot] - 1 of 4
Aggregate Server Access Protocol (ASAP) (Experimental) - 1 of 4
draft-ietf-rserpool-asap-20.txt
Note: Before reading this ballot set please read draft-ietf-rserpool-overview
  Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins (reviewed -19 for LC)
     
Endpoint Handlespace Redundancy Protocol (ENRP) (Experimental)
draft-ietf-rserpool-enrp-20.txt
Note: Before reading this ballot set please read draft-ietf-rserpool-overview
  Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani (reviewed -19 for LC)
     
Aggregate Server Access Protocol (ASAP) and Endpoint Handlespace Redundancy Protocol (ENRP) Parameters (Experimental)
draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-17.txt
Note: Before reading this ballot set please read draft-ietf-rserpool-overview
  Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan (reviewed -16 for LC)
     
Reliable Server Pooling Policies (Experimental)
draft-ietf-rserpool-policies-09.txt
Note: Before reading this ballot set please read draft-ietf-rserpool-overview
Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer:Elwyn Davies (reviewed -08 for LC)
    
TSVAn Overview of Reliable Server Pooling Protocols (Informational) - 2 of 4
draft-ietf-rserpool-overview-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Doc Shepherd: Maureen Stillman
Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer: 
    
RAIRequirements for Management of Overload in the Session Initiation Protocol (Informational) - 3 of 4
draft-ietf-sipping-overload-reqs-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan
    
SECTLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (Informational) - 4 of 4
draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Pasi Eronen
  Reviewer: Ben Campbell (already reviewed)
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
TSVThreats Introduced by RSerPool and Requirements for Security in Response to Threats (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-rserpool-threats-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: PROTO Shepherd: Maureen Stillman
Please read RSERPOOL Overview document and the protocol specifications first.
  Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer: Ben Campbell  (reviewed -12: Ready)
   

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVComments on the Usefulness of Simple Best-Effort Traffic (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-floyd-tsvwg-besteffort-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Suggested response: " 2. The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in TSVWG, but this does not prevent publishing."
Token: Lars Eggert
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE
3.3.3 For Action
      AreaDate
GENGuidelines for Using the Privacy Mechanism for SIP (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-munakata-sip-privacy-guideline-03.txt
Token: Russ Housley