Gen-ART Review Assignments for July 17, 2008

Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-07-17).


2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSNov 28Management Event Management Information Base (MIB) for PacketCable- and IPCablecom-Compliant Devices (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6
draft-ietf-ipcdn-pktc-eventmess-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Richard Woundy [Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com] is the PROTO shepherd of this document.
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Pasi Eronen (-12 ready with nits)
    
TSVA Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 6
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net)
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (already reviewed for LC)
    
RAICarrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6
draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo-19.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (already reviewed for LC)
    
RAIExtensible Markup Language (XML) Format Extension for Representing Copy Control Attributes in Resource Lists (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-sipping-capacity-attribute-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (reviewed -05 for LC)
    
INTEthernet Pseudowire (PW) Management Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6
draft-ietf-pwe3-enet-mib-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (already reviewed)
    
INTPseudowire (PW) over MPLS PSN Management Information Base (MIB) (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6
draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mpls-mib-14.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer: Joel Halpern (already reviewed)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPOgg Media Types (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2
draft-goncalves-rfc3534bis-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Intended for AD sponsoring
Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer:Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC)
    
SECJun 6Using Authenticated Encryption Algorithms with the Encrypted Payload of the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2
draft-black-ipsec-ikev2-aead-modes-01.txt
Note: pseudo Last Call on ipsec@ietf.org
  Token: Tim Polk
  Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
   
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
OPSA Framework for Packet Selection and Reporting (Informational) - 1 of 3
draft-ietf-psamp-framework-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (reviewed -12 for LC)
    
TSVTCP's Reaction to Soft Errors (Informational) - 2 of 3
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Document Shepherd: Mark Allman (mallman@icir.org)
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (assigned LC due 7/14)
    
INTAAA Goals for Mobile IPv6 (Informational) - 3 of 3
draft-ietf-mext-aaa-ha-goals-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Eric Gray (already reviewed for LC: Not Ready)
   
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
INTCisco Systems' Private VLANs: Scalable Security in a Multi-Client Environment (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-sanjib-private-vlan-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: This is an independent submission, going on telechat for RFC3932 check.
Token: Mark Townsley
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE
3.3.3 For Action
      AreaDate
GENECC Brainpool Standard Curves and Curve Generation (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-lochter-pkix-brainpool-ecc-01.txt
Token: Tim Polk