Gen-ART Review Assignments for 9 October 2009




2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
RAITransmission Time offsets in RTP streams (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-toffset-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Tom Taylor is the PROTO Shepherd
Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer:Gonzalo Camarillo (already reviewed for LC; no review needed)
    
RAIExample calls flows of race conditions in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) (BCP) - 2 of 6
draft-ietf-sipping-race-examples-06.txt
Token: Jon Peterson
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (reviewed -05 for LC; new review needed)
    
RTGForCES Forwarding Element Model (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6
draft-ietf-forces-model-15.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
  Reviewer:Elwyn Davies (already reviewed; no review needed)
    
OPSCAPWAP Protocol Specification (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6
draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-specification-13.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Suresh Krishnan (reviewed -11 for LC; new review needed)
    
OPSCAPWAP Protocol Binding for IEEE 802.11 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6
draft-ietf-capwap-protocol-binding-ieee80211-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Dan Romascanu
  Reviewer:Joel Halpern (reviewed -08 ; Ready)
    
RAIRTP Payload Format for ITU-T Recommendation G.711.1 (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g711wb-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Roni Even is the document shepherd.
  Token: Cullen Jennings
  Reviewer: Scott Brim (already reviewed for LC; no review needed)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GEN JWT Report on MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-bryant-mpls-tp-jwt-report-00.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: David Ward
Reviewer: Ben Campbell (JUST assigned LC due on 10/29 - not sure why this is on the agenda so early)
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
SECSyntax for binding documents with time stamps (Informational) - 1 of 2
draft-santoni-timestampeddata-04.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Tim Polk
GENMANET Autoconfiguration using Virtual Enterprise Traversal (VET) (Informational) - 2 of 2
draft-templin-autoconf-dhcp-16.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Ross Callon
3.3.3 For Action
      AreaDate
GENPPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt
Token: Russ Housley