Gen-ART Review Assignments for 04 December 2008




2. Protocol Actions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
         

2.1 WG Submissions

          2.1.1 New Item
      AreaDate
TSVNFS Version 4 Minor Version 1 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 11
draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-26.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Brian Pawslowski (beepy@netapp.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:David Black (assigned LC due Nov 27)
    
TSVpNFS Block/Volume Layout (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 11
draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-block-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (reviewed -09 for LC)
    
TSVObject-based pNFS Operations (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 11
draft-ietf-nfsv4-pnfs-obj-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (already reviewed for LC)
    
APPSieve Notification Mechanism: mailto (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 11
draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Barry Leiba to be the expert reviewer for the registry this creates.
Token: Lisa Dusseault
  Reviewer:Ben Campbell (reviewed -07 for LC)
    
INTDual Stack Mobile IPv4 (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 11
draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-08.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (reviewed -07 for LC)
    
APPExtended URLFETCH for binary and converted parts (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 11
draft-cridland-urlfetch-binary-03.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Eric Burger is document shepherd.  Note this is a lemonade WG document despite the name.
Token: Chris Newman
  Reviewer:Peter McCann
    
APPThe IMAP NOTIFY Extension (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 11
draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-07.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Eric Burger is document shepherd
Token: Chris Newman
  Reviewer:Brian Carpenter (already reviewed for LC)
    
INTMeasures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 11
draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Mark Townsley
  Reviewer:Scott Brim (reviewed -07 for LC: No Objection)
    
INTMultiple Care-of Addresses Registration (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 11
draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-10.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer:Elwyn Davies (already reviewed for LC)
    
TSVNFSv4 Minor Version 1 XDR Description (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 11
draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-dot-x-09.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Brian Pawslowski (beepy@netapp.com) is the document shepherd.
Token: Lars Eggert
  Reviewer:Vijay Gurbani (already reviewed for LC)
    
INTReserved IPv6 Interface Identifiers (Proposed Standard) - 11 of 11
draft-ietf-6man-reserved-iids-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
  Token: Jari Arkko
  Reviewer: Robert Sparks (assigned for LC due 20 November)
   
2.1.2 Returning Item
      AreaDate
TSVGIST: General Internet Signalling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-17.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: RE-evaluate your ABSTAIN positions. All that stays in ABSTAIN please indicate in the comment field that you have performed this re-evaluation and also include some motivation behind your decision.
  Token: Magnus Westerlund
  Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan (reviewed -15 for 27 March)
   

2.2 Individual Submissions

          2.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENIESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions (BCP) - 1 of 1
draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-06.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Note: Diff: http://www.arkko.com/ietf/iesg/rfc3932bisdiff.html
Token: Jari Arkko
2.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3. Document Actions

         

3.1 WG Submissions

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.1.1 New Item
      NONE
3.1.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD

Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
          3.2.1 New Item
      AreaDate
GENIANA Allocation Guidelines for the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules-01.txt [Open Web Ballot]
Token: Russ Housley
3.2.2 Returning Item
      NONE

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor

The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
document shepherd.

Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
          3.3.1 New Item
      AreaDate
APPDNS Blacklists and Whitelists (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt
Note: Propose to respond "1. The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work."
Token: Lisa Dusseault
3.3.2 Returning Item
      NONE
3.3.3 For Action
      AreaDate
INTPPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) Extensions for Credit Flow and Link Metrics (Informational) - 1 of 1
draft-bberry-rfc4938bis-00.txt
Note: Independent submission, being reviewed by pppext
Token: Mark Townsley