Document: draft-cam-winget-eap-fast-provisioning-08.txt Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 1 Jul 2008 IESG Telechat date: 3 Jul 2008 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Two comments and 3 nits below. Comments: 1/ In S4.1.{2,3}, there is a term "PAC opaque". I think you mean "PAC-Opaque", the opaque data that was defined in S4.1.1. 2/ In S6.3, first paragraph: should the "should" on line 3 be normative? More so especially since the "MAY" seven lines down is normative. Nits (on the chance that RFC Editor misses them): 1/ S3.2.3, third bullet item: missing the ending period. 2/ S4.1.2, last sentence of first paragraph: s/persisted/persistent OR s/persisted/persists 3/ S6.2, second paragraph, 10th line: s/and ,/and,