Draft: draft-eastlake-nlpid-iana-considerations-03.txt
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Review Date: 4 December 2009

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
be fixed before publication.

Comments:

The acronym NLPID should be expanded in the title of the draft.

The second paragraph of the Introduction could be more clear. It states
that "the term NLPID is used for these values." These values seems to
refer to most values that are usable both as IPI and SPI but if the
phrase could be rephrased to be more clear, that would be useful.

Adding a hyphen so that "one octet" becomes "one-octet" throughout the
text would help as well.

In Section 3, the draft states: "To simplify this process, it is
desirable to maintain an IETF Liaison to ISO/IEC JTC1 SC6." Who is the
receiver of this statement. It seems to me that such advice should be
sent to the IAB so that they continue this liaison relationship.
Clarifying who is the receiver of this statement would be useful.