Document: draft-groves-megaco-pkgereg-03.txt Reviewer: Pete McCann Review Date: 19 May 2009 IESG Telechat date: 21 May 2009 Summary: I reviewed -02 during last call. The new text in the Security Considerations introduced a few nits, and some of my other nits were not addresses by the revision. Otherwise, if the IESG is satisfied that specifications of public packages don't have to be public then the document is Ready. Major issues: The question of whether public packages should have public specifications still needs to be resolved; see the text in Section 5.2 under item 3 subitem c. Currently the text allows for non-public specifications. Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: Section 4: OLD: As at this date NEW: As of this date OLD: As H.248 is a master slave protocol if the malicious NEW: As H.248 is a master slave protocol, if the malicious OLD: there would be no affect NEW: there would be no effect Section 6.2: OLD: On the request for an Error Code registration, the IANA shall forward thr received information (i.e. the Error Code text (Specification required) to the IESG appointed expert for review (See section 4.3). NEW: On the request for an Error Code registration, the IANA shall forward the received information (i.e. the Error Code text and required specification) to the IESG appointed expert for review (See section 4.3). Section 6.3: OLD: On the request for an Error Code registration, the IANA shall forward the received information (i.e. the Service Change Reason text (Specification required) to the IESG appointed expert for review (See section 4.4). NEW: On the request for an Error Code registration, the IANA shall forward the received information (i.e. the Service Change Reason text and required specification) to the IESG appointed expert for review (See section 4.4).