Document: draft-ietf-behave-v6v4-framework-09
    Framework for IPv4/IPv6 Translation
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 11-June-2010
IETF LC End Date: 15-June-2010
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

The first minor item below should be considered for repair.
The second minor item really needs to be fixed.

Major issues: None

Minor issues:  There is a sentence in section 1.4 of this draft which reads:
   There will come a time to set a date after which no one is
   obligated to carry native IPv4 but it
   would be premature to attempt to do so yet.
My problem is that except for business drivers, which are not up to us, 
no one is "obliged" to carry native IPv4 now.  If someone wants to build 
their network using pure IPv6, they can.  (And I have heard of one 
service provider who is doing so.)  Is this sentence actually useful?

In section 3.1.1, Figure 9 is for stateless translation, and figure 10 is 
for stateful translation.  Unfortunately, a  cut-and-paste error has 
resulted in the translator box in figure 10 being labeled "Stateless XLAT."  
It should be "Stateful XLAT."