Document: draft-ietf-capwap-base-mib-08 Reviewer: David L. Black Review Date: January 17, 2010 IESG Telechat date: January 21, 2010 Summary: This draft is on the right track, but has open issues, described in the review. Comments: This draft defines a MIB for the CAPWAP protocol. It also extends that protocol in support of the MIB, which is an unusual thing to do in a MIB document. The authors have resolved all of the other comments from the original Gen-ART review, but have left this open issue for potential IESG consideration. The original Gen-ART review asked: Why is Section 9 (CAPWAP Message Element Extension) in a MIB draft? MIB drafts generally do not make changes to the protocol that they provide management for. That is still an open issue. I suggest that IESG discussion of this is appropriate - as is the case with IESG Discuss comments, this suggestion should not be mis-read as an inflexible demand for a change. idnits 2.11.17 ran clean aside from asking whether a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work is required - such a disclaimer does not appear to be required.