This is an update of my review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-06, 
based on the newly released version 07.

Updated Summary: Ready for publication. (I said draft standard the 
first time-but this is intended as a proposed standard, right?)

Major Issues: None
Minor Issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

> > -- Abstract, first paragraph, first sentence:
> > 
> > I can't parse first part of sentence. Should "… connections are controlled …" be "…connections controlled…"? 
> > 
No change--I still can't parse the first part of the sentence. Maybe 
the phrase "may independently exist" is the problem?
> > 
> > -- 2nd paragraph:
> > 
> > I don't see any mention of PathTear in 4.2.1.1.
> > 
I think I meant to say the first paragraph, not the second. But I still don't see the term "PathTear" mentioned in 4.2.1.1.

> > -- section 7.1:
> > 
> > Is this intended to recommend IANA choose 25?
No change. You say the bit number is (TBD by IANA) (25). Is the 25 a 
recommendation? (in which case, "(TBD by IANA, 25 preferred)" would be helpful.

> > 
> > -- section 7.2:
> > 
> > Do you mean to recommend a code of 35?
> > 
No change--same as above.