Document: draft-ietf-dccp-ccid4-04.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com> 
Review Date: 6-June-2009 
IETF LC End Date: 22-June-2009
IESG Telechat Date: 07-July-2009


Summary: The document is ready for publication as an experimental RFC. I have one question with respect to the IANA registration of new codes (see
below)

Major issues: none

Minor issues:

- In Sections 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, etc., the draft indicates that the IANA registration of new codes requires "IESG review, approval, and standards-track IETF RFC publication". Considering that THIS draft is in the experimental category, is it reasonable to ask future codes to be on the standards (and not experimental) track for registration of new codes. 
In other words, this draft does not even qualify itself for registration of its own codes!

I think the policy should be according to "Specification Required" (see RFC 5226.

Nits/editorial comments:

- A Caption to the figure in Section 8.7 would be nice. For example: 
"Figure 1: Dropped Packets Option". The same applies to the two figures in Section 8.7.1.