Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-06
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Feb-19-2010
IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-04

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

It has 0 major issues, 0 minor issues and 2 nits.

1) In the Abstract, the draft has references of the form
 "[DRAFT1, DRAFT2, DRAFT3]".  I would humbly suggest that
 these be removed from the Abstract and placed in the body
 of the document.  In their current form, these references
 appear, well ... temporary, given their names (DRAFT1, etc.)

 I have come across services that index IETF RFCs and also
 include the abstract in the index.  In that context, having an
 Abstract include references to seemingly impermanent
 placeholders appears disconcerting.  Note that references
 to RFC numbers themselves -- as the Abstract also shows -- is
 okay since RFC numbers denote some sort of permanence.

2) The references "DRAFT1" etc. seem to best fit in
 Section 1, paragraph 4.