Document: draft-ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req-08
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2010–10–25
IETF LC End Date: 2010–11–10
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1.       In section 2  why not reference RFC 2119 or at least  copy 
the definition from RFC 2119 for  the capitalized term.

2.       In section 3.9 when you say "if this technique is used", by this 
do you mean certificate –less or the flow defined in the previous sentence.

3.       In section 4.6.3 the first paragraph defines the requirements for 
Cryptographic Binding. It looks to me like the rest of the section talks 
about a specific use case, so why is it in the requirements section and 
not in section 3. 

Nits/editorial comments: