I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-04.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date:  2009-01-24
IESG Telechat date: 29 January 2009

Summary: Almost ready

Comments: My Last Call comments were addressed, thanks.
I did notice one more minor point:

> 11.  IANA Considerations
...
>   The "Traffic-action" extended community defined in this document has
>   6 unused bits which can be used to convey additional meaning.
>   Authors would like to ask IANA to create and maintain a new registry
>   entitled: "Traffic Action Fields".  These values should be assigned
>   via IETF Consensus rules only.  

RFC5226 doesn't describe a policy called "IETF Consensus".
It has been replaced by "IETF Review". This could be fixed by
a note to the RFC Editor.