I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-06.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2009-04-02 IETF LC End Date: 2009-04-03 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready -------- Comments: --------- The technical description is clear and did not raise any questions in my mind. I did not check the MIB module in detail. Editorial issues: ----------------- I question whether this document really needs the pre-5378 disclaimer ("This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008..."). There is nothing in the Acknowledgments or anywhere else to suggest that it incorporates any such text. So why is it there? This could matter, since a reader who doesn't actually understand the rules in detail might conclude that extracting the MIB text and including it in a product is not allowed, whereas *every* version of the IETF copyright rules has allowed this. It would be better if the disclaimer can be dropped from the RFC. == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ipfix-architecture has been published as RFC 5470 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-ipfix-as has been published as RFC 5472 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-framework has been published as RFC 5474 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech has been published as RFC 5475 == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-psamp-protocol has been published as RFC 5476