Document: draft-ietf-lemonade-architecture-03.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com> 
Review Date: 2008-10-21 
IETF LC End Date: 2008-10-27

Summary: A major question of the usefulness of this document is raised. 
If this issue can be addressed, the document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Comments:

- The document is well written and clear. However, I have a major problem because I haven't found the usefulness of this document. For sure we can write and publish hundreds of documents in the IETF, but if they aren't useful, it's a waste of time for everyone. I am sorry to say that I include this ID as one of these documents. In particular, I haven't found answers to these questions:

- What is the purpose of this document?
- What is the benefit of this document to the community?
- Why do you think someone familiar with the OMA Mobile Email architecture will ever read this document?
- Who is the target audience of this document?

I haven't found answers to these questions, and that makes me feel that the document is useless. However, the document is also harmless.

My recommendation is to add a lot of motivation around the questions that I have raised. This will certainly help to position the document with the right audience.

- Other than that, I just have a couple of nits:
  + Expand abbreviations at first occurrence: OMA, WG.
  + As a matter of taste, I don't like to mention names of working groups in IETF documents, since working groups sooner or later disappear, making the permanent RFCs look like old.