Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-framework-11.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.a.garcia@ericsson.com>
Review Date: 19-April-2010
IETF LC End Date: 21-April-2010

Summary: The document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments: The document is well written. There are a 
few nits that you may want to polish:

1) Add missing acronyms to the Terminology Section (Section 1.3). For example, I am missing MS-PW, LER, CE, PDU, MAC, PSC, PSN, FCAPS, ACH, MPLS BFD, VCCV, ME, MIG, DCN. I also recommend to order these terms in alphabetical order, otherwise it is hard to find a term.

2) Perhaps you can add a short definition of Layer Network and Network 
Layer in Sections 1.3.9 and 1.3.10, respectively (besides the reference to 
the corresponding RFCs). But a definition would be nice to be here.

3) The first paragraph in Section 1.3.11 is incomplete: "(see "

4) On Section 3.4., the 4th paragraph has a self recursive sentence:

   "A PW provides any emulated service that the IETF has defined to be
   provided by a PW, ..."

   Of bviously, the PW provides a service provided by a PW. Isn't there a loop?

5) Figures 3 and 4 are so long that they expand beyond a single page. Can 
you split these figures into two pieces each? At least, it looks like it 
is possible.

6) In Figure 12, s/pcket/packet

7) There is something wrong with the format of the reference sections: 
it seems that there are two columns, the left one being too wide and 
the right one being too narrow.