Document: draft-ietf-pce-of-06 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 9 Jan 2009 IESG Telechat date: 15 Jan 2009 Summary: Ready for publication Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: Only 2 things left to comment on: 1) Your edit for the extra ')' in the Objective functions got more than you intended. Objective function code 3 is now correct, but you need to put a ')' back into the definition for Objective function code 2. (The diff at http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-of-06.txt makes this easy to see) 2) I assume the alignment with the [PCE] bnf (specifically the addition of the clause isn't something that needs WG re-review?