Document: draft-ietf-shim6-multihome-shim-api-15
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2011-2-1
IETF LC End Date: 2011-2-10
IESG Telechat date:

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Informational RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1.       In section 8.2 the path exploration parameters are different from RFC
5534, missing keep alive interval. Why the difference.

2.       In section 11.1 you discuss conflict resolution for SHIM6, is this
also relevant for HIP or is it a specific SHIM6 problem. This also relates to
the issue of conflict resolution discussed in the security section.

3.       The last sentence in appendix A "Any solution is needed to
overcome the problem mentioned above" is not clear, does it mean that
there is no solution to the context forking problem.  Section 11.1 claims that
using the procedure described it addresses this issue, am I missing something.

Nits/editorial comments:

1.       In 8.2 for pe_keepaliveto, what are the units, I assume it is
seconds.

2.       In section 7 section paragraph "in which one ore" should be
"in which one or"