Document: draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-seconds-02.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2010/11/16 IESG Telechat date: 2010/11/18 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it has one minor issue. Minor ===== * RFC5230 describes a site-defined maximum value for the :days parameter and * this draft describes a similar maximum for the :seconds parameter. It is * unclear how these two maximums will interact. Say The site defined maximum for :days is 30 and that for :seconds is 2678400 (31 days) If the value of :seconds as specified is 2678300 will it get truncated down to 2592000 (30 days) or will it be used as is since it is less than 2678400?