Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-00.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 9 August 2010
IETF LC End Date: 5 August 2010
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary:
A useful snapshot of the ISP situation.  Pretty much ready apart from a 
couple of pieces that ought to be clarified.  However a couple of parts of 
the document are awash with acronyms/jargon for techniques that do not 
have clear references to RFCs where they are defined.  

Major issues:
None.

Minor issues:
There are a large number of IPv6 jargon terms in the draft.  A glossary 
and pointers to the places where they are defined would be useful both for 
this draft and for others in future. Section 2.5 is particularly densely 
populated but other places also suffer - maybe they could be tied back 
to RFCs mentioned in s1.

s4.3, third bullet:  It would be good to understand *how* ISPs apparently 
misunderstand tunnel brokers if that is what is meant.  The comment in 
the appendix indicates that they misunderstood the question rather then the 
technology.  Please clarify.  

Nits/editorial comments:
s2.5, last para:
> >    Asked about plans for Mobile IPv6 (or Nemo mobile networks), 19% said
> >    yes, and 71% said no, with the others uncertain.
Plans to do what with Mobile IPv6?