SIP Threads from Jul 31 - Aug 4
31 Jul 00: LDAP schema for SIP
Is it worth the effort in defining a schema for SIP? Henning sees
this more as an extension of an existing (person) schema than something
new.
31 Jul 00: Proxy initiating a BYE
1 Aug 00: Proxy initiating a BYE - contd.
Dvir Oren asks about proxies initiating a BYE. Proxies don't
initiate
BYEs, but B2BUAs do. No issues.
31 Jul 00: SIP Call Control Services
Some questions asked, Robert Sparks notes these are resolved by the
REFER draft and soon-to-be-started seperate multi-party conferencing
work.
31 Jul 00: SIP-T Draft Feedback
Adam Roach brings up many issues with
draft-vemuri-sip-t-context-00.txt. Nothing outside of this scope.
31 Jul 00: draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-02.txt
Adam Roach brings up many issues with
draft-ietf-sip-session-timer-02.txt. No responses.
31 Jul 00: SIP Presence and Instant Messaging prototype
Robert Sparks announces the availability of a prototype.
1 Aug 00: Change in SIP URL syntax
Discussion of SIP URL syntax. Questions about whether @ signs need
to
be escaped in URL parameters. Resolution when Henning notes that @
is
a reserved character and must be escaped.
2 Aug 00: Legal Loop Detection
Hisham Khartabil brings up some text in the july 13th bis that says
that a proy server must not send a request to a host already listed in
the Via list, but this breaks legal loops. Jonathan Rosenberg says
this text must be removed.
1 Aug 00: IMPP:Following the long WG session
2 Aug 00: a proposal for a way to compromise? (really, not a joke)
Two threads on IMPP and its involvement with SIP. Neither
bring up
any issues with the SIP spec.
2 Aug 00: Comment on draft-moyer-sip-appliances-framework-00.txt
Ben Campbell questions whether sip-appliances's RPC mechanism is
appropriate for SIP. This launches into a large discussion, none of
which brings up any SIP open issues.
2 Aug 00: DTMF discussion from WG meeting
Rohan Mahy discusses what he brought up at the IETF about DTMF digits
in SIP. Suggests using a SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY mechanism.
2 Aug 00: TIPHON SIP presentation on-line
At http://pages.hotbot.com/edu/sijben/
2 Aug 00: Events mailing list
At http://www.egroups.com/messages/sip-events
3 Aug 00: A universal problem with the t= line.
Question about the t= line in SDP which only allows for 10 digits.
Resolution is that nobody thinks this is a big problem.
3 Aug 00: How to locate a user?
Question abotu SIP location servers. No issues.
3 Aug 00: Further queries on SIP Draft
Some questions were asked about the 00 bis, all of which Henning
noted as being already clarified in the 01 bis.
3 Aug 00: What do we want with SIP?
Some comments about the scope of SIP. No replies and no issues.
3 Aug 00: SIP - Research
Question about SIP and IP mobility research. No issues.
3 Aug 00: More inconsistencies and questions
Peter Kjellerstedt brougt up some issues with bis-01. Some
discussion
about using the existing TCP connection for responses to transactions
should be clarified in the spec.
4 Aug 00: Via header encryption and "received" parameter.
Issue was brought up about hiding the via. Jonathan Rosenberg notes
that this was already clarified in bis-01.
3 Aug 00: QOS and SIP Questions...
Question about QOS use and SIP. No replies.
3 Aug 00 via headers required?
Yes, Via is required.
4 Aug 00: SIP parser: newbie
Question about using lexx/yacc with SIP. No issues.
4 Aug 00: Authorization Header in PGP
Authorization = "Authorization" ":" "pgp"
#pgp-response
vs
Authorization = "Authorization" ":" "pgp"
1#pgp-response ?
Jonathan Rosenberg thinks it should be 1#
4 Aug 00: questions on SIP/SDP
Some unanswered questions on how to use SDP to do various things.
No
replies. Compiler's note: SDP has many limitations.
4 Aug 00: received parameter is invalid
Gethin Liddell notes that the proposed received=host[:port] is invalid
since : is not a token. Igor asks when the [:port] thing happend,
since it won't really work. Compiler's note: I think this was
continued in another thread, since the [:port] thing definitely does
not work.
4 Aug 00: SIP and World Domination
Philosophical discussion about the scope of SIP. No issues.
4 Aug 00: Keep it simple
Well deserved warning to please keep SIP simple. No issues.