Notes on SIP Session 1, IETF 68
reported by Lei Zhu

SIP meeting

Agenda is agreed
request to see the newest draft
request to pay attention on the draft stopping discusstion.

Change the order of agenda 

draft-ietf-sip-gruu-12
Jonathan Rosenberg
Cisco

New changes from-11

XCON chaire: should use URI parameter

J, URI parameter may be to many

comments: Gruu parameter used for proxy.

comment: why just give 5 seconds. The time before notification can be 6 seconds.

comment: the problem is just the short time of network registeration. right

comment: a little value. if the Gruu registeration is just used in this way. 
Alan: Client and server must use it. 
J, the usage is just in case of GRUU 

comment: experiation is one hour, 

Andrew: this approach is less impact to network

comments: what's requirement
J, the gruu need the srynize.

comments: if the notification lost?  
J, the re-subscribe let user know the situation.

comments: vailated maybe not work 
show hand, about half vs. half
If the people thint is critical to decide
show hand, support

comment: request to give explaination

Option 1: agree to support-> over 10

Option 2: take this out-> several

Summarize: Go forward.


draft-ietf-sip-ice-option-tag-01
Jonathan Rosenberg
Cisco

Deanm wills: is it supported by RFC 3261
J, yes.

The change should be disscused with sipping.



Process for Revising 3261

Mechanism for Publication 
Prioritization of Issues 
Which current drafts are bugfixes? 

Robert Sparks
critical changes to RFC 3261
rewrite

should be merged in one document about essental correction

Essental corrections
problem fork-loop

Not essential correction

comments: the extention need to be included.

R, the only thing about RFC 3261

J, the essential corrections are drafts

R, need some time to identify if is essential. 

J, if extention, just go to another document. yes

comments: worry about what is the essential

comments: the secrity consideration is for today but RFC 3261, so the change is needed.

comments: how to change, need new RFC number? yes.

Andrew: 3GPP need some change for them. maybe some extent for critieria

comments: if it can change UDp to be used by SIP

comments: it is based on the jugement. will break someting. if we deced to go forward, maybe some many non-essential change happen.

comments: should be carefule, can impact somebody's feel. if the document is same long as RFC3261. need some aspect of this document.

J, need to say which change and why to change.

chair; assign rebort to chair this item. Action item for Robert.

comments: too large

answer: make comments for draft and keep track.

Summarize: Go forward